ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Technical Trends in Management of ACL Reconstructions in 2025: A Major League Soccer Team Physicians Survey.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains a subject of ongoing debate. In practice, graft selection in ACLR is multifactorial, with patient characteristics, activity level, and surgeon preference/training background all playing a crucial role in the clinical decision-making process. While graft trends have been reported across select professional sports leagues, none have focused specifically on professional soccer. Purpose: To report current trends in graft preference for ACLR among Major League Soccer (MLS) surgeons. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A 39-question survey was distributed to 27 orthopaedic surgeons affiliated with MLS teams in January 2025. The questionnaire captured each respondent's preferences regarding ACLR management in both the general population and high-level/professional soccer athletes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. Results: Surgeons averaged 7.7 years caring for MLS teams and performed a mean of 80 ± 27 ACLRs annually. In primary ACLR for professional soccer athletes, the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft was preferred (74%), followed by the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft (22.2%). The hamstring tendon (HT) autograft was uncommon (3.7%). Similar trends were reported for the general population: BPTB autograft (70%), QT autograft (22.2%), and HT autograft (3.7%). For revision procedures, QT autograft was favored (48.2%), followed by BPTB autograft (25.9%) and BPTB allograft (11.1%). Contralateral autografts were more common in revisions (44.4%) than in primary cases (7.4%). Lateral extra-articular augmentation (LEA) was performed in 31.5% of primary cases and 76% of revision cases; iliotibial band tenodesis was favored over anterolateral ligament reconstruction (74.1% vs 25.9%). LEA utilization increased compared with 5 years prior (6.4% vs 29.4%). Conclusion: Among orthopaedic surgeons caring for MLS athletes, BPTB autografts were the preferred graft for primary ACLR. QT autografts were preferred over HT autografts in primary ACLR, and QT autografts were most commonly used in revision surgery. HT autografts were rarely used in primary ACLR and were not preferred in revision scenarios. LEA procedures were widely used among professional soccer athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.