ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Impact of varying degree of donor-recipient weight mismatch on survival outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation.
Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Body weight is still the most common metric used for donor-recipient matching in Pediatric Heart Transplantation (PHTX) and its impact on long-term outcomes remains unclear from variable definition and conflicting evidence. In this study, the outcomes of varying weight mismatch on PHTX was analysed. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database (1984-2025) was retrospectively analysed. Size mismatch as a percentage donor-recipient weight difference was categorized as Mild (≤ 20%), Moderate (20-30%), Extreme (> 30%), and stratified as undersizing or oversizing. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and post-transplant outcomes were compared. One-year and 15-year mortality were analysed using multivariable logistic and Cox regression, respectively. Results: Oversizing (80%, 9,175/11,583) was more common than undersizing (20%, 2,408/11,583). With increasing oversizing, the recipients were younger, had congenital heart disease (CHD) diagnosis, and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance but with shorter wait-list times. Oversizing had no impact on 30-day, 1-year, or 15-years survival. With increasing undersizing, recipient age was similar, had less restrictive cardiomyopathy diagnosis, and had female donor but with shorter wait-list times. Undersizing had inferior survival till 5-years but not at 15-years. However, on multivariable analysis, undersizing was not predictive of inferior survival anytime as was congenital heart disease diagnosis, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) bridge, elevated pulmonary-vascular resistance, transplantation era, and post-transplant rejection, stroke, and dialysis use. Conclusions: Oversizing is more likely than undersizing in PHTX. While oversizing had no overall survival impact, undersizing had negative mid-term but not long-term survival impact which disappeared when adjusted for underlying cardiac diagnosis, elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, transplantation era and occurrence of post-transplant complications. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-026-02195-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.