Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42367211›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2026

RNA Detection Technologies: A MethodCentric Guide to Principles and Reproducibility.

Midhun Krishnan Vasanthakrishnan, Marion Hogg, Kif Liakath-Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Midhun Krishnan VasanthakrishnanSchool of Biological Sciences, Highfield Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Marion HoggDepartment of Biosciences, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton campus, Nottingham, UK.
Kif Liakath-AliSchool of Biological Sciences, Highfield Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA detection techniques have expanded into a diverse methodological landscape spanning hybridization, amplification, imaging, and sequencing. In this review, we provide a methodcentric synthesis of the major technologies that define this landscape, emphasizing how each method's core principle, practical strengths, and sources of variability shape its reproducibility. Beginning with foundational approaches, we trace the development of isothermal amplification, quantitative and digital PCR, microarrays, singlemolecule imaging, multiplexed spatial methods, and amplificationfree digital quantification. We then examine the transformative impact of bulk, singlecell, longread, directRNA, and spatial transcriptomics, as well as CRISPRbased detection and metabolic labeling for RNA dynamics. Across these technologies, we focus on reproducibility as a defining dimension of evaluation: mature methods benefit from established standards, whereas newer approaches remain prestandardization and require careful, experimentspecific controls. Rigorous method selection must be guided by the biological question, required resolution, sample constraints, and the maturity of each method's reproducibility framework. We conclude that RNA detection methods form interconnected methodological paths of problemsolving rather than simple replacements.

Indexed as

Quantitative PCRReproducibility standardsRNA detectionRNA sequencingSpatial transcriptomicsTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42367211
PMCPMC13293988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.