Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42367073›Full record

SynthesisStem cells translational medicine2026

Isolation and characterization of human multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring cells for use in tissue engineering: a systematic review.

Ingrid Garzón, Miguel Ángel Martín-Piedra, Luis Martínez-Girón, Miguel Alaminos, James J Yoo, Anthony Atala

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Stem cells translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ingrid GarzónTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, 18016, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Martín-PiedraTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, 18016, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4639-3175
Luis Martínez-GirónTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, 18016, Spain.
Miguel AlaminosTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, 18016, Spain.
James J YooWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, United States.
Anthony AtalaWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, United States.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) FIS PI23/00335Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) FIS PI24/00006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (MUSE) cells represent a promising cell population for tissue engineering and translational medicine owing to their intrinsic pluripotency and stress resistance. MUSE cells express pluripotency markers such as SSEA-3, Nanog, Sox2, and Oct3/4, while maintaining their immunomodulatory capabilities. This systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42024532621) analyzed studies on human MUSE cell isolation, characterization, and translational potential through searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in April 2024. The TIDieR and SYRCLE checklists were used to assess the risk of bias. Our findings identified 34 studies that followed the PRISMA guidelines for assessing different tissue sources, isolation techniques, and characterization methods. MUSE cells are primarily obtained from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting is the predominant isolation method. Characterization was mainly performed using SSEA-3 immunodetection (positivity ranged from <1% to 6.30%) and was linked to the expression of pluripotency and mesenchymal markers. These findings highlight the relevance of MUSE cells in regenerative medicine as a distinct pluripotent subpopulation within adult mesenchymal tissues. In addition, SSEA-3-based isolation approaches complemented by functional assays has emerged as a key methodological approach for the reliable identification and characterization of MUSE cells. However, isolation efficiency varies depending on the cell source and method. Standardized protocols are, therefore, needed to improve reproducibility and facilitate the translational development of MUSE cell-based regenerative therapies.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell LineageCell SeparationMesenchymal Stem CellsPluripotent Stem CellsTissue EngineeringHumansRegenerative Medicinecell- and tissue-based therapyMUSE cellspluripotent stem cellsregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID42367073
PMCPMC13311668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.