ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Prospective policy analysis of healthcare workforce policies for effective non-communicable disease prevention and management in Meghalaya, India.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changing health systems-advancing justice and sustainability through research, policy and practice.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a prospective policy analysis of healthcare workforce (human resources for health, HRH) reforms in Meghalaya, India, a state facing dual challenges of a rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and persistent inequities in access to medical and public health specialists. Grounded in a health systems and social justice perspective, this study examines current HRH needs and proposed reforms, evaluating their potential to address the evolving health demands of the population, particularly among poor and marginalized groups vulnerable to NCDs. Using secondary evidence, including national surveys, epidemiological data, and government reports, the study maps workforce gaps, especially in rural and tribal regions, and highlights the physician-centric nature of HRH governance in India. The Walt and Gilson policy triangle, combined with adapted HRH evaluation frameworks, guided the analysis of policy context, content, processes, and actors. This approach identified key gaps in recruitment, rural retention, cadre structures, and specialist training for effective NCD prevention and management. A scenario analysis, using the Intuitive Logic method, developed a best-case trajectory of reform achievable through equity-oriented design, strong political will, and institutional capacity, while recognizing risks of policy stagnation. Findings indicate that achieving a socially accountable HRH system characterized by equitable distribution, transparent governance, and meaningful community engagement is critical for improving NCD outcomes and reducing health inequities, particularly by preventing financial distress among the poor. The study contributes to health policy and systems research by linking institutional design to future health system resilience, underscoring the need to embed justice, participation, and adaptability within HRH governance to effectively address present and future health challenges in low-resource contexts such as Meghalaya.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.