ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Hybrid Governance: Negotiating justice for health services in informal urban settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changing health systems-advancing justice and sustainability through research, policy and practice.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper examines the complex governance landscape of public health service delivery in the informal urban settlements of Dhaka, Bangladesh, through the application of Hybrid Governance and Urban Political Ecology (UPE) frameworks. Rapid urbanization and insufficient state capacity have led to the development of informal settlements, where conventional governance structures are absent. In this context, hybrid governance systems emerge, which are characterized by collaborations and conflicts among formal authorities, non-state and informal actors, and local community members. In-depth empirical data were drawn from multi-method qualitative research applying community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches, conducted between 2021 and 2023, in two informal urban settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh. This paper introduces a "Multi-layered Hybrid Governance" (MHG) framework that explains the complex governance arrangements of public health service delivery in informal urban settlements. The MHG framework features the fragile yet resilient nature of collaborations between formal authorities (state-level governing bodies), formal governance actors (elected local government representatives) and their informal representatives (community leaders, local elites), private service providers (including NGOs), and community members, revealing how public health services are negotiated and legitimized within these informal contexts. The findings suggest that hybrid governance is a form of community resilience that can enhance service delivery in the absence of effective state intervention. However, it can also reinforce existing inequalities and introduce new challenges to residents, especially to those without political connection or strong social networks. This paper urges policymakers and researchers to look beyond conventional health governance models and recognize the limitations of the existing systems. By presenting the MHG framework as an analytical tool for learning health systems from the perspectives of those on the margins, we advocate for more inclusive, resilient governance approaches for promoting justice and ensuring sustainability within fragmented urban health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.