Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42367025›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2026

Assessment of community health workforce governance in federal Nepal.

Roosa Sofia Tikkanen, Sushmita Pokhrel, Usha Ghimire, Biraj Neupane, Svea Closser, Bernadette Nirmal Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roosa Sofia TikkanenDepartment of Sociology and Political Science, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Edvard Bulls veg 1, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-8043
Sushmita PokhrelDepartment of Sociology and Political Science, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Edvard Bulls veg 1, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Usha GhimireInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom.
Biraj NeupaneSchool of Information Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 614 E. Daniel Street, Champaign, IL 61820, United States.
Svea ClosserJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8337-9957
Bernadette Nirmal KumarNorwegian Public Health Institute, Postboks 222 Skøyen, 0213 Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Norwegian University of Science and Technology 2023#972521109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How Community Health Worker (CHWs) programs are governed shapes their performance. CHW governance can be challenged by CHWs' accountability to both governments and their communities, and the need to coordinate between multiple actors. Furthermore, little is known about how decentralization impacts CHW governance. We examined Nepal's Female community health volunteers (FCHV), where a 2015 constitutional change to federalism-a major governance reform representing one form of decentralization-shifted the responsibility for community health governance to local municipalities. We assessed FCHV governance in the federal landscape and provide preliminary insights into how federalization has impacted FCHV governance in its early years. We identified opportunities and challenges brought by federalization for six actors: federal, provincial and municipal governments, international donors, FCHVs and their representative organizations (unions), and non-governmental organizations. Our qualitative case study comprised 26 semi-structured interviews and five focus groups conducted with FCHVs, health workers, federal and municipal government representatives, researchers, and FCHV union, donor and NGO representatives, across four districts in Bagmati Province, combined with analysis of 259 documents. We analysed these data using a theoretical framework of CHW governance adapted from seven existing frameworks on health workforce and community health governance. We show that FCHV governance was characterized by improved accountability, transparency, participation, and responsiveness to local needs, to some extent. Decentralization remained incomplete, with governance challenged by limited budgetary and administrative decision-space at local levels, in part because of continued central-level control and limited revenue-raising capacity, coordination, and enforcement challenges, as well as lack of role clarity. While donors and NGOs participate in decision-making, FCHVs and their representative organizations are not consistently consulted. The results indicate that strengthening FCHV governance in federal Nepal will require capacity-building of municipalities while loosening the federal grip.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersFederal GovernmentFemaleFocus GroupsHumansNepalPoliticsPublic Health InfrastructureQualitative ResearchVolunteerscommunity healthdecentralizationgovernancehealth workershealth workforcelocal government

Identifiers

PMID42367025
PMCPMC13311675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.