ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
A river, frontline families, and the double-edged sword of community participation: how nutrition interventions are shaped at the village level in Dhubri, India.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changing health systems-advancing justice and sustainability through research, policy and practice.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper explores how top-down health interventions engage with and reshape communities at the village level, focusing on nutrition interventions as tracers to examine the functioning of local health systems. Drawing on 28 in-depth interviews and 6 focus group discussions conducted in Dhubri district, Assam, the study investigates how such interventions are delivered through a health system constituted of both formal structures and informal arrangements, deeply influenced by the ecology of the Brahmaputra River. Using an exploratory qualitative approach, the study surfaces five key themes. First, seasonal disruptions linked to the river significantly affect service continuity, revealing the inadequacy of existing policies to respond to environmental vulnerability. Second, the creation of 'frontline families'-where the personal lives and unpaid labour of frontline health workers' households are drawn into service delivery-reflects systemic dependence on invisible support. Third, community participation emerges as a double-edged sword, simultaneously enabling programme reach and generating unrealistic demands and burdens on frontline actors. Fourth, informal spaces and interpersonal relationships underpin much of the operational success of interventions, compensating for gaps in formal governance and infrastructure. Finally, symbolic campaigns, detached from local material realities, often foster alienation rather than awareness. The findings call for a rethinking of intervention design and delivery that take account of embedded social, ecological, and institutional realities. The paper argues that building just and sustainable health systems requires recognising and supporting the informal, relational, and contextual dimensions that currently remain overlooked in dominant policy frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.