ReviewDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2026
Management of Colorectal Sessile Serrated Lesions in Elderly Patients.
Review in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are established precursor lesions of colorectal cancer arising through the serrated neoplasia pathway and are estimated to account for a substantial proportion of sporadic colorectal cancers. Accumulating evidence has clarified their distinctive endoscopic, histopathological, and molecular characteristics, including frequent BRAF mutations, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and progression toward microsatellite instability-high carcinoma. Although the natural history of nondysplastic SSLs is generally slow, lesions that acquire dysplasia may demonstrate more rapid neoplastic progression. With increasing global longevity, the management of SSLs in elderly patients has become a clinically important issue. In this population, clinical decision-making is complicated by higher risks of colonoscopy-related adverse events, antithrombotic use, comorbidities, frailty, and reduced tolerance to bowel preparation or sedation. At the same time, the oncologic benefit of endoscopic treatment or continued surveillance may be limited by remaining life expectancy. Current surveillance recommendations for SSLs are gradually becoming more explicit across regions; however, these recommendations are largely extrapolated from studies of conventional adenomas and mixed-age populations, and elderly-specific evidence remains limited. Consequently, the management of elderly patients with colorectal SSLs requires individualized decision-making integrating lesion-related risk, procedural burden, frailty, life expectancy, and the quality of prior colonoscopic examinations. This review summarizes current evidence regarding colorectal SSLs and discusses practical considerations for individualized management in elderly patients, with particular emphasis on balancing oncologic benefit against procedural risk and long-term surveillance burden in an aging society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.