Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366698›Full record

ArticleSpecial care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry

Dental Professionals' Attitudes Toward Treating Patients With Sensory Impairments: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Amir Laviv, Amichai Dvir, Itzhak Agayev, Michael V Joachim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amir LavivDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Amichai DvirDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Itzhak AgayevDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Michael V JoachimDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3577-276X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo analyze and compare the attitudes, perceived barriers, and professional confidence of dental students and practicing dentists toward treating patients with sensory impairments, and to examine associations with prior clinical experience and personal connection to disability. METHODS AND

resultsThis cross-sectional study used a structured questionnaire adapted from validated instruments, with items grouped into three composite indices (Attitudes, Barriers, and Confidence), each scored as the mean of constituent Likert items (Cronbach's α: 0.597, 0.773, and 0.579, respectively). Ninety-three participants were recruited (46 dental students; 47 practicing dentists). Group comparisons used Mann-Whitney U tests with rank-biserial correlation (r) as the effect size measure and Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction. Overall, participants reported positive attitudes toward treating patients with sensory impairments. Practitioners reported higher confidence than students (r = -0.40, p = 0.008) and fewer perceived barriers across several items. Prior clinical experience was associated with higher confidence and fewer barriers regardless of disability type. Experience treating patients with visual impairment showed the broadest pattern-spanning attitudes, barriers, and confidence (all composite p < 0.01, effect sizes r = -0.38 to -0.55)-likely reflecting, at least in part, greater curricular and/or clinical emphasis on visual disability relative to hearing loss in the study setting-though no formal curricular audit was conducted as part of this study, and this interpretation remains speculative pending direct assessment of training exposure. No significant associations were found for gender or personal connection to disability (all p values were FDR-adjusted).

conclusionClinical experience with patients with sensory impairments is consistently associated with greater preparedness among dental students and practitioners. These findings highlight the value of structured, impairment-specific clinical training within dental education.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDental Care for Persons with DisabilitiesDentistsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleStudents, DentalSurveys and Questionnairesclinical experiencedental attitudesdental educationperceived barrierssensory impairmentsspecial care dentistry

Identifiers

PMID42366698
PMCPMC13311737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.