ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2026
Older parent-adult child contact and proximity across Europe: new evidence, digital communication, and measurement issues.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe aim to provide updated, comparative evidence on the prevalence of frequent (face-to-face, telephone, and digital) contact and close proximity between older parents and their children, and to assess how measurement choices affect cross-national patterns in Europe.
methodsWe use data on 23 European countries from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe wave 9 (2021-2022) and the European Social Survey round 10 (2020-2022) to estimate the prevalence of frequent contact and close proximity across different approaches: most-contacted versus random child, any versus mode-specific contact, distance versus travel-time thresholds. Cross-national coherence in country rankings is assessed with Spearman rank correlations.
resultsWe find a pronounced regional gradient from Southern Europe, with the highest levels of any-mode and face-to-face frequent contact and close proximity, to Nordic and several Continental countries, with the lowest. Eastern Europe lies in-between, with high internal heterogeneity. Instead, digital contact does not follow a clear geographic pattern. Face-to-face and phone contact remain widespread, whereas text and especially video contact are less common. Measurement choices substantially shift prevalence levels, and although country orderings are often similar, concordance is weak for proximity measures based on spatial distance and travel time. DISCUSSION: We document persistent family-regime differences and interpret digital contact as a supplementary channel of associational solidarity that does not reflect the traditional North/South gradient. We also show that survey design choices matter not only for levels but sometimes also for cross-national orderings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.