Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366637›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2026

Effect of Humidity on Ionisation and Ion Chemistry in Active-Capillary Dielectric Barrier Discharge Ionisation.

Miroslav Polášek, Patrik Španěl, Kseniya Dryahina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miroslav PolášekJ. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha, Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3753-4738
Patrik ŠpanělJ. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha, Czechia.
Kseniya DryahinaJ. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha, Czechia.

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 24-12564S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDielectric barrier discharge ionisation (DBDI) in an active-capillary configuration (including the commercial SICRIT source) is widely used as a soft, ambient-pressure ionisation method for vapours and gases, yet the role of water vapour in controlling reagent ion chemistry and analytical behaviour has not been mechanistically described. Thus, it is necessary to understand how carrier gas humidity governs reagent ion populations and product ion formation in a DBDI source.

methodsA SICRIT ion source was coupled to a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer and operated under constant discharge conditions while switching the carrier gas between humidified and nominally dry air. Ketones and short-chain carboxylic acids were introduced at trace vapour concentrations using permeation or diffusion tubes. Reagent ion and analyte mass spectra were acquired in full-scan mode. Selected analyte ions were subjected to collision-induced dissociation (CID) to compare in-source fragments with those formed from protonated molecules.

resultsUnder humid conditions, the reagent ion population was dominated by hydrated hydronium ions. Analytes yielded mainly protonated molecules, MH

conclusionsThese results highlight humidity as a key operational active-capillary DBDI parameter; varying it enables both low-fragmentation ionisation in humid mode and more energetic fragmenting ionisation in dry mode. The humid mode facilitates reproducible quantitation, whereas the dry mode allows structural discrimination, exemplified by differentiation of hexanone isomers.

Indexed as

active capillaryatmospheric pressure ionisationDBDIhumiditySICRIT

Identifiers

PMID42366637
PMCPMC13311739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.