Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366574›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026

Intraluminal Appendiceal Migration of an Intrauterine Device Without Appendicitis: A Case Report.

Ángel Sánchez Tinajero, Jusseline Villegas Amador, Dulce Diana Guerra Aguirre, Danna Patricia Ruiz Santillán, María Del Carmen Zamora López, Anita Ríos Pérez, Juan Ramón Razo Blancas

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ángel Sánchez TinajeroDepartment of General Surgery, Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), Hospital number 23, Metepec, Hidalgo, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5123-9535
Jusseline Villegas AmadorDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), Hospital number 23, Metepec, Hidalgo, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0000-3171-1305
Dulce Diana Guerra AguirreDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), Hospital number 23, Metepec, Hidalgo, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0000-8329-5999
Danna Patricia Ruiz SantillánDepartment of Gynecology, Tacuba General Hospital, Institute for Social Security and Services for State Employees (ISSSTE), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8154-0698
María Del Carmen Zamora LópezDepartment of General Surgery, Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), Hospital number 23, Metepec, Hidalgo, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0006-8372-4494
Anita Ríos PérezDepartment of General Surgery, Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), Hospital number 23, Metepec, Hidalgo, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0007-7995-6935
Juan Ramón Razo BlancasDepartment of General Surgery, Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), Hospital number 23, Metepec, Hidalgo, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The intrauterine device (IUD) is a commonly used contraceptive method in emerging countries, such as Mexico and several Latin American nations. IUD insertion is a well-described and relatively simple procedure; however, one of its rare complications is migration to nearby extrauterine structures. CASE REPORT The patient was a 37-year-old woman with a history of cesarean delivery 5 years earlier. After an abortion managed by instrumental uterine curettage in 2024, a copper intrauterine device (IUD) was placed, with no immediate complications. However, 1 month later, she experienced intermittent mild cramping in the lower abdomen, which intensified 1 year later (2025) and for which she sought medical evaluation. The initial examination included a pelvic ultrasound, which revealed the absence of the IUD within the uterine cavity. After a hysteroscopy and computed tomography (CT), the gynecology and obstetrics department performed an exploratory laparotomy. The transoperative findings were as follows: right iliac fossa with displaced IUD, whose arms were located in the right fimbria, while the body of the device was apparently visible within the appendicular lumen. The cecal appendix showed no macroscopic evidence of pathology. The patient's progress was satisfactory, with no immediate or delayed complications. CONCLUSIONS This case is the first record in the medical and scientific literature in which the IUD was found intraluminally in the appendix, without macroscopic or clinical data of acute appendicitis. This case also highlights the need for early diagnosis and timely treatment of seemingly rare conditions, to reduce complications arising from procedures considered routine, such as IUD insertion.

Indexed as

AppendixForeign-Body MigrationIntrauterine Device MigrationIntrauterine DevicesIntrauterine Devices, CopperAdultFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID42366574
PMCPMC13330634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.