ArticleMolecular microbiology2026
Distinct Spatial Organisation of Rho and RNA Polymerase in Salmonella Cells.
Article in Molecular microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rho is a conserved, ATP-dependent RNA translocase that terminates transcription at hundreds of sites across bacterial genomes. Although the molecular mechanism of Rho-dependent termination is well characterized, its spatial interplay with RNA polymerase (RNAP) within bacterial cells remains elusive. To address this question, we constructed intragenic, in-frame fusions inserting mCherry or sfGFP 48 amino acid residues downstream of the N-terminus of Rho in Salmonella. Strikingly, mCherry-but not sfGFP-renders the first 48 residues of Rho dispensable. RhoΔ48::mCherry is viable in single copy and exhibits wild-type termination activity in vitro, whereas the full-length Rho::sfGFP fusion, although viable, slows growth and shows strongly reduced activity. Structured illumination microscopy (SIM) revealed that, despite these functional differences, both constructs exhibit similar localisation patterns relative to fluorescently tagged RNAP in single cells. During exponential growth, both Rho and RNAP form discrete clusters, but with markedly distinct spatial organisations: RNAP clusters associate with the nucleoid, whereas Rho is distributed throughout the cell body. This spatial partitioning persists in stationary phase, where RNAP becomes diffusely associated with a compacted nucleoid while Rho accumulates at the cell periphery. The widespread distribution of Rho at cytoplasmic locations is unexpected and suggests participation in cellular functions beyond its canonical role in transcription termination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.