ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2026
Application of an innovative embedded parallel pancreaticojejunostomy technique in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the clinical value of an innovative embedded parallel pancreaticojejunostomy technique for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 108 patients who underwent successful laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy at The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, from January 2016 to July 2025. Patients were divided according to the type of pancreaticojejunostomy: the experimental group (n = 57) underwent an embedded parallel pancreaticojejunostomy, while the control group (n = 51) underwent duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. The baseline characteristics, tumor features, intraoperative and postoperative conditions, and complications were compared between the two groups. And through a multivariate logistic regression model, the independent effects of the surgical groups (experimental group, control group) were evaluated.
resultsThe incidence of grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula in the experimental group (5.3%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (19.6%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The pancreaticojejunostomy time (21.33 ± 2.73 min), postoperative drainage tube removal time (14.00, 10.00-17.50 days), and postoperative hospitalization (16.00, 12.50-21.00 days) in the experimental group were all significantly shorter than those in the control group (31.43 ± 2.30 min; 17.00, 11.00-28.00 days; 20.00, 13.00-29.00 days, respectively; all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the two groups in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Fistula Risk Score, main pancreatic duct diameter, sex, body mass index, pathological type, maximal tumor diameter, pancreatic texture, intraoperative margin status, lymph node metastasis, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, delayed gastric emptying, or postoperative bleeding. And the intervention measure (experimental group, control group) was independent protective factors for reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR=0.19, 95% Cl, 0.05-0.75, P < 0.05).
conclusionThe embedded parallel pancreaticojejunostomy technique can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula and shorten pancreaticojejunostomy time. This technique is a simple and effective new method for pancreaticojejunostomy and is worthy of application in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.