ArticleEnvironmental evidence2026
What evidence exists for the environmental outcomes of nature-based aquaculture systems? a systematic map protocol.
Article in Environmental evidence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNature-based solutions (NbS) are defined as actions that protect, conserve, restore, and sustainably use natural or modified ecosystems. These actions aim to deliver environmental services, enhance biodiversity, and support societal well-being. NbS are increasingly promoted across a wide range of sectors, including agriculture, coastal management, and civil engineering. However, despite being introduced almost twenty years ago, NBS appear not to have been widely and explicitly adopted in aquaculture production systems policies and practices, arguably because there is little evidence of their efficacy in improving environmental outcomes and production. This systematic map therefore seeks to address the primary review question: What evidence exists in the literature on reported environmental outcomes associated with nature-based approaches in aquaculture? To answer this question, the study will identify, collate, and characterize the available evidence on nature-based approaches applied within aquaculture systems.
methodsThis systematic map will follow a structured evidence-synthesis approach to identify and characterize literature on nature-based solutions in aquaculture. Comprehensive searches will be conducted across established scientific databases using carefully developed search strings, and these will be complemented by targeted grey literature searches across specialist aquaculture and NbS platforms, as well as Google Scholar. Retrieved records will be screened at title, abstract, and full-text levels against predefined eligibility criteria. Studies will be included if they focus on aquaculture systems, examine interventions framed as or consistent with NbS, report outcomes related to environmental performance, socio-economic value, or policy relevance, and are based on empirical evidence from peer-reviewed or credible grey literature sources. Data from eligible studies will be extracted and summarized descriptively, followed by a narrative synthesis to identify thematic clusters, geographical patterns, and gaps in the evidence base. The outputs will provide a structured knowledge base to inform researchers, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to expand the application of NbS in aquaculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.