ArticleRespiratory research2026
Necroptosis in alveolar epithelium orchestrates lung ischemia-reperfusion injury: a multi-omics study.
Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung ischemia-reperfusion injury (LIRI) is a leading cause of early morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation and other cardiopulmonary procedures. It is characterized by acute sterile inflammation driven by regulated cell death (RCD). While various RCD modalities, including apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis, have been implicated in lung injury, their relative contributions and distinct activation patterns in LIRI remain poorly defined.
methodsWe employed an integrated multi-omics approach combining transcriptomics and proteomics with histological and functional validations in a murine hilar clamping model of LIRI. Key findings were further corroborated using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from human lung transplant recipients. The functional role of necroptosis was validated using pharmacological inhibitors (Nec-1, GSK'872) and Mlkl-deficient (Mlkl
resultsLIRI triggered acute, time-dependent lung injury peaking within 24 h of reperfusion. Although transcriptomic profiling suggested broad activation of multiple RCD pathways, proteomic and biochemical analyses revealed a distinct landscape in our experimental setting: markers of apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis were either downregulated or showed no significant positive correlation with injury severity and inflammatory peaks. In contrast, the necroptotic pathway emerged as a highly activated modality. Specifically, necroptosis, marked by phosphorylated RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL, was localized primarily in alveolar epithelial cells, correlated strongly with cytokine release and histological lung injury, and preceded the inflammatory response. Pharmacological inhibition or genetic ablation of necroptosis significantly attenuated tissue damage and inflammation. This pronounced necroptotic signature appeared distinct from the broad multi-pathway activation observed in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lung injury. Translational analysis of human scRNA-seq data further confirmed the selective upregulation of necroptosis signatures in alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells following lung transplantation.
conclusionOur multi-omics analysis identifies necroptosis, particularly in alveolar epithelial cells, as a critical driver of sterile inflammation and tissue injury in the early phase of LIRI. Targeting alveolar epithelial necroptosis may represent a precise and promising therapeutic strategy for lung transplantation and ischemia-reperfusion-associated pulmonary disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.