Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366335›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2026

Proteomic analysis of malignant ascites and its impact on ovarian cancer spheroids.

Jack Scanlan, Parul Mittal, Jennifer Washington, Clifford Young, Michael Antoniou, Marina Kochetkova, Martin K Oehler, Peter Hoffmann, Manuela Klingler-Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jack ScanlanMass Spectrometry & Proteomics Group, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9525-0609
Parul MittalMass Spectrometry & Proteomics Group, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0139-9757
Jennifer WashingtonMass Spectrometry & Proteomics Group, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Clifford YoungMass Spectrometry & Proteomics Group, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3945-286X
Michael AntoniouCentre for Cancer Biology, An Alliance Between SA Pathology and Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5302-9251
Marina KochetkovaCentre for Cancer Biology, An Alliance Between SA Pathology and Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Martin K OehlerRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Peter HoffmannMass Spectrometry & Proteomics Group, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8493-2208
Manuela Klingler-HoffmannMass Spectrometry & Proteomics Group, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Manuela.klingler-hoffmann@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2165-7813

Funding

Tour de Cure Ltd RSP-384-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost advanced ovarian cancer patients develop malignant ascites, which describes a buildup of fluid in the peritoneal cavity caused by increased vascular permeability and obstructed lymphatic drainage. Malignant ascites contains cancer cells, which can aggregate as spheroids, as well as stromal cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and blood cells that create a complex tumor microenvironment. This study explores the proteome of ascites and how this environment affects the viability, phenotypes, proteomes, and treatment responses of ovarian cancer cells.

methodsUsing label-free proteomics, we compared the proteomes of cell-free malignant ascites from ovarian cancer patients with those of serum. Additionally, we examined the ex vivo chemotherapy responses of cancer spheroids cultured in ascites. Through detailed proteomic analysis of cells grown as 2D or 3D in tissue culture medium or ascites, we identified biological pathways and specific proteins induced by ascites. Finally, we performed orthogonal validation of a candidate marker, TGM2, using immunofluorescent staining.

resultsProteomics of cell-free ascites identified increased levels of extracellular, secreted, and membrane proteins when compared to serum. Ascites enhanced the baseline cell viability and spheroid formation of immortalized ovarian cancer cell lines compared to standard cell culture medium. However, chemotherapy-induced cell death of spheroids grown in standard cell culture medium remained proportional to changes observed in ascites-cultured spheroids. Ascites-driven phenotypic changes were not recapitulated by adding selected chemokines nor periostin to the cell culture medium, suggesting that additional factors are required. Notably, ascites induced similar ECM, secreted, and membrane proteins across 2D and 3D models, including TGM2, which was validated in spheroids through immunofluorescent staining.

conclusionsThis study contributes to our understanding of the role of ascites in the regulation of the proteome and viability of cancer cells. It provides evidence for the induction of TGM2 expression by ascites. Results from this pilot study warrant further study in a larger cohort.

Indexed as

Label-free quantificationMalignant ascitesOvarian cancerProteomics

Identifiers

PMID42366335
PMCPMC13621715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.