Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366283›Full record

ArticleCarbon balance and management2026

Centralized resource allocation with technological progress under a meta-frontier framework: towards China's "Energy-economy-emission" optimization.

Fei Yang, Haitao Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fei YangXUTELI School, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Haitao XiongSchool of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 100048, China. xionghaitao@btbu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFA0602500National Natural Science Foundation of China 42571221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient resource allocation is crucial for promoting economic growth and reducing carbon emissions in China. This study develops a new centralized resource allocation approach based on data envelopment analysis (DEA). It incorporates technological progress into the environmental production possibility set and further extends it to a technological heterogeneity setting under a meta-frontier framework. The environmental efficiency of each decision-making unit is encouraged to achieve its future group frontier. The advantage of the proposed method is that, it enhances the forward-looking nature of decision-making, explicitly captures technological heterogeneity within the allocation framework, and improves the incentive compatibility of target setting while maintaining feasibility. It is then applied to optimize China's "energy-economy-emissions" system. The results show that the optimal interprovincial allocation of energy consumption and labor can increase the aggregate economic output of the 30 provinces by 6.95% relative to 2023, while generating a carbon reduction potential of 5,681.17 million tons. In addition, optimal allocation combined with appropriate incentives could further raise economic output in 2024 by 1.8% and reduce emissions by 47.19%. Severe labor misallocation is found between the eastern and central regions. Sensitivity analysis further suggests that policymakers should place moderately greater weight on economic development than on emission reduction. Several managerial implications are derived accordingly.

Indexed as

Centralized resource allocationDEA“Energy-economy-emission” optimizationTechnological heterogeneityTechnological progress

Identifiers

PMID42366283
PMCPMC13591933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.