Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366243›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Research on factors influencing teaching staff's continued use intention of AIGC tools: based on structural equation modeling and artificial neural networks.

Wenbiao Xiao, Dongmei Xia, Ju Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenbiao XiaoSchool of Educational Science, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Dongmei XiaChongqing Children's Education Development Research Center, School of Family Education, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing, China.
Ju MaoSchool of Educational Science, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. maoju1688@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have applied models such as UTAUT to investigate users' intentions to adopt new technological tools. However, these studies have primarily focused on initial usage intentions, paying limited attention to continuance intention. To address this gap and provide a more comprehensive understanding of HE teaching staff's continuance intention toward AIGC tools, this study innovatively integrates ECM and UTAUT to develop a novel framework for examining this continuance intention. Using a combined approach of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models, data from 310 HE teaching staff in China were analyzed. The results show that: (1) perceived usefulness, satisfaction, effort expectancy, and performance expectancy have significant direct effects on teaching staff's continued intention to use; (2) social influence and perceived risk do not have significant effects on continued intention; (3) perceived usefulness and expectation confirmation have significant positive effects on continued intention through satisfaction: The ANN analysis further indicates that the relative importance of the predictors of continuance intention, in descending order, is as follows: performance expectancy, satisfaction, expectation confirmation, effort expectancy, and perceived usefulness; (4) the ANN analysis further indicates that the relative importance of the predictors of continuance intention, in descending order, is as follows: performance expectancy, satisfaction, expectation confirmation, effort expectancy, and perceived usefulness.

Indexed as

FacultyIntentionNeural Networks, ComputerTeachingChinaHumansArtificial Intelligence Generated ContentContinued usage intentionECM modelHE teaching staffUTAUT model

Identifiers

PMID42366243
PMCPMC13545078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.