Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366236›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep learning for time-series segmentation of mechanical ventilator waveforms.

Preeti Gupta, Aditya Nemani, Virginia R de Sa, Alex K Pearce, Shamim Nemati, Atul Malhotra, Jason Y Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Preeti GuptaScripps Research Translational Institute, San Diego, CA, USA. prgupta@scripps.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9972-2123
Aditya NemaniUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Virginia R de SaUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Alex K PearceUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Shamim NematiUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Atul MalhotraUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jason Y AdamsUniversity of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

CTSA K12 Program at The Scripps Research InstituteK12TR004410 · NCATS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI Laura Nicholson, Athena Philis-Tsimikas · 2023 to 2026
$3.9M
Is Obstructive Sleep Apnea Important in the Development of Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG063925 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2020 to 2024
$3.7M
Underlying mechanisms of obesity-induced obstructive sleep apneaR01HL148436 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Atul Malhotra · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
Sleep Apnea Endophenotypes: One Size Does Not Fit AllR01HL154926 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
The cardiovascular consequences of sleep apnea plus COPD (Overlap syndrome)R01HL166485 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Atul Malhotra · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
VentNet: A Real-Time Multimodal Data Integration Model for Prediction of Respiratory Failure in Patients with COVID-19R01HL157985 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL, NEMATI, SHAMIM · 2022 to 2025
$2.9M
Developing a Diverse Next Generation of Leaders in Respiratory ScienceT32HL166127 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Laura Elise Crotty Alexander, Atul Malhotra · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004410NCATS NIH HHS K12TR004410NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148436NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL154926NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157985NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL166485NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL166127NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of ventilator waveforms is essential for detecting patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVAs), yet current heuristic methods can fail in noisy, real-world data. We developed and validated a deep learning model using a one-dimensional attention-gated U-Net architecture to identify inspiratory and expiratory onsets in mechanical ventilation waveforms. The model was trained and tested on 9719 breaths from 33 patients and outperformed published rule-based methods, achieving F1 scores of > 0.99 for both inspiratory and expiratory onset detection within a 0.1-s tolerance window. Performance remained robust in asynchronous breaths (F1 ≥ 0.98). When applied to quantify PVAs, the model reproduced reference standard asynchrony frequencies with no significant differences, whereas heuristic methods produced large deviations. Gradient-weighted class activation maps suggest that the model leveraged a diverse set of waveform features to inform segmentation. This computationally efficient model enables highly-accurate, clinically timely waveform analysis and provides a foundation for scalable, reproducible assessment of ventilator-patient interactions.

Identifiers

PMID42366236
PMCPMC13600923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.