ArticleScientific reports2026
An enhanced multi-strategy educational competition optimizer for numerical optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes an Enhanced Multi-Strategy Educational Competition Optimizer (EMSECO) to address the inherent limitations of the standard Educational Competition Optimizer, specifically its imbalanced exploration-exploitation dynamics, insufficient diversity preservation, and suboptimal convergence behavior. Three synergistic mechanisms are integrated. Firstly, an undergraduate education stage is embedded within the original cyclical framework, leveraging differential vector guidance to augment spatial coverage and sustain diversity. Secondly, a graduate education stage is introduced as an external intensification module, utilizing elite individual and elite subpopulation guidance to strengthen local exploitation. Thirdly, a random walk restart strategy is incorporated to perturb stagnated individuals, thereby suppressing premature convergence. Comparative experiments against AE, MRFO, SAO, EOSMA, ALSHADE, and EPSCA across multiple dimensionalities demonstrate that EMSECO achieves superior performance, attaining average Friedman rankings of 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, and 2.0 for 10-, 30-, 50-, and 100-dimensional CEC 2017 test functions, respectively. Practical applicability is further validated through seven real-world engineering problems. In summary, the proposed EMSECO algorithm exhibits enhanced global exploration capacity, improved local exploitation efficiency, and superior convergence stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.