ArticleKorean journal of radiology2026
Deep Learning-Based Automated Detection and Burden Assessment of Paramagnetic Rim Lesions on Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) framework for automated detection and burden assessment of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) by using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in multiple sclerosis (MS), compare QSM-only and QSM + fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) configurations, and evaluate the clinical relevance of the automated PRL burden. MATERIALS AND
methodsBrain magnetic resonance imaging data, including QSM and three-dimensional (3D) FLAIR data, obtained between January and December 2025, were retrospectively collected from 106 patients suspected of having MS. The dataset consisted of an exploration set (n = 84)-divided into training (n = 54) and internal test (n = 30) sets-and a temporal test set (n = 22). The PRLs were manually segmented to establish the ground truth. A 3D nnU-Net framework was trained using the QSM-only and QSM + FLAIR configurations for patient-level classification, lesion-level detection, and PRL burden assessment. A separate clinical implication cohort (n = 117) was used to assess the associations between the automated PRL burden and clinical outcomes.
resultsIn the exploration set (median age: 40.0 years; 67.9% female), 69 (82.1%) patients were PRL-positive, with a total of 705 PRLs. In the internal test set, the QSM-only model showed higher lesion-level sensitivity (72.4% [147/203] vs. 62.1% [126/203],
conclusionQSM-based DL models enabled automated detection and burden assessment of PRLs in MS, with the QSM-only model performing comparably to QSM + FLAIR while offering a simplified single-sequence pipeline. The association between the automated PRL burden and cognitive impairment highlights its potential as a biomarker for MS assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.