Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366024›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology2026

Deep Learning-Based Automated Detection and Burden Assessment of Paramagnetic Rim Lesions on Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.

Eunseon Jeong, Dayoung Seo, Hye Hyeon Moon, Habin Yun, Yangsean Choi, Eun-Jae Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eunseon Jeong *Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2110-944X
Dayoung Seo *Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1435-6018
Hye Hyeon MoonDepartment of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Habin YunUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9629-969X
Yangsean ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. phillipchoi007@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1674-7101
Eun-Jae LeeDepartment of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. eunjae.lee@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8047-1029

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2025-16064441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) framework for automated detection and burden assessment of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) by using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in multiple sclerosis (MS), compare QSM-only and QSM + fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) configurations, and evaluate the clinical relevance of the automated PRL burden. MATERIALS AND

methodsBrain magnetic resonance imaging data, including QSM and three-dimensional (3D) FLAIR data, obtained between January and December 2025, were retrospectively collected from 106 patients suspected of having MS. The dataset consisted of an exploration set (n = 84)-divided into training (n = 54) and internal test (n = 30) sets-and a temporal test set (n = 22). The PRLs were manually segmented to establish the ground truth. A 3D nnU-Net framework was trained using the QSM-only and QSM + FLAIR configurations for patient-level classification, lesion-level detection, and PRL burden assessment. A separate clinical implication cohort (n = 117) was used to assess the associations between the automated PRL burden and clinical outcomes.

resultsIn the exploration set (median age: 40.0 years; 67.9% female), 69 (82.1%) patients were PRL-positive, with a total of 705 PRLs. In the internal test set, the QSM-only model showed higher lesion-level sensitivity (72.4% [147/203] vs. 62.1% [126/203],

conclusionQSM-based DL models enabled automated detection and burden assessment of PRLs in MS, with the QSM-only model performing comparably to QSM + FLAIR while offering a simplified single-sequence pipeline. The association between the automated PRL burden and cognitive impairment highlights its potential as a biomarker for MS assessment.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisAdultBrainFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingMultiple sclerosisParamagnetic rim lesionQuantitative susceptibility mapping

Identifiers

PMID42366024
PMCPMC13437205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.