Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366009›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Contact activation of coagulation in newly inserted central venous catheters (CAS-2): protocol for a randomised controlled study comparing four commercially available catheters.

Aida Zorlak, Leila Naddi, Ola Borgquist, Thomas Kander

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07014722 (Contact Activation of Coagulation in Newly Inserted Central Catheters - a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07014722 narecruitingnot on this map

Contact Activation of Coagulation in Newly Inserted Central Catheters - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas KanderRan2025 to 2026Enrolled88ConditionsCentral Venous Catheter, Coagulation, Coagulation Activation, Central Venous Catheter ComplicationsArmsMERITMEDICAL Careflow™ Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter, ARROW Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter, ARROWg+ard Blue Plus® Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter, Multicath 2 Expert UP Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aida ZorlakDepartment of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden aida.zorlak@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3167-2792
Leila NaddiDepartment of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2711-5866
Ola BorgquistAnaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Lund, Sweden.
Thomas KanderDepartment of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-2981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCentral venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in modern healthcare. Insertion of a CVC promotes a hypercoagulable environment, in part through activation of the intrinsic coagulation pathway. We have previously shown that blood obtained from newly inserted CVCs demonstrates immediate coagulation activation, with differences between samples collected directly after insertion and after flushing of the catheter. The aim of this randomised trial is to compare early coagulation activation between four commonly used CVCs and to assess whether the different CVCs demonstrate different degrees of coagulation activation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, randomised, parallel-group trial where adult patients (≥18 years) with a clinical indication for a two-lumen CVC will be eligible for inclusion. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive one of four commercially available CVCs. The calculated sample size is 88 participants. Two blood samples will be obtained from each newly inserted CVC, the first obtained from the initial backflow of blood within seconds after insertion and the second after flush and discard. Samples will be analysed using rotational thromboelastometry with the non-activated thromboelastometry (ROTEM NATEM) and plasma-based coagulation assays. The primary outcome is the between-group comparison of the change in ROTEM NATEM clotting time between the two samples. Secondary outcomes include within-group and overall cohort comparisons of changes in clotting time. Additional secondary outcomes are between-group, within-group and overall cohort comparisons of changes in other ROTEM NATEM parameters, including clot formation time, alpha angle and maximum clot firmness, and changes in plasma-based coagulation markers, including prothrombin time-international normalised ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, Factor VII, Factor XII and thrombin-antithrombin complex concentration. The results may help identify catheter materials that are less prone to activate coagulation and support in the selection and development of CVCs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (#2022-00265-0). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before inclusion. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07014722.

Indexed as

Blood CoagulationCatheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThrombelastographyAdult intensive & critical careINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARERandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID42366009
PMCPMC13311638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.