Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366001›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Theory-based dyadic co-learning intervention to enhance family resilience in men with prostate cancer and their spouses in Taiwan: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Ching-Hui Chien, Cheng-Keng Chuang, Chun-Te Wu, See-Tong Pang, Kai-Jei Yu, Po-Hung Lin, Kuan-Lin Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07196488 (Development and Exploring the Efficacy of a Dyadic Co-learning Intervention for Patients With Prostate Cancer and Their Spouses), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07196488 narecruitingnot on this map

Development and Exploring the Efficacy of a Dyadic Co-learning Intervention for Patients With Prostate Cancer and Their Spouses

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsProstate Cancer (Adenocarcinoma)ArmsDyadic Co-learning Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ching-Hui ChienSchool of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei City, Taiwan chinghui@ntunhs.edu.tw kuanlin@cgmh.org.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2528-9934
Cheng-Keng ChuangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Chun-Te WuSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
See-Tong PangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Kai-Jei YuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Po-Hung LinDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Kuan-Lin LiuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung City, Taiwan chinghui@ntunhs.edu.tw kuanlin@cgmh.org.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-3938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer often disrupt patients' and their spouses' established family lives, requiring them to reestablish a sense of balance. This study aims to develop and evaluate a dyadic co-learning intervention derived from the activation-reinforcement-adjustment theory of family resilience for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An experimental study design was employed. Prostate cancer patients and their spouses (n=60 pairs) will be recruited from the outpatient department. Following baseline assessment, participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group (1:1). The intervention group receives an 8 week dyadic co-learning intervention and usual care, whereas the control group receives usual care. All participants complete follow-up assessments at 10 weeks and 16 weeks after the pretest. Structured questionnaires included the Resilience Scale, the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire, the Loneliness Scale, the Chinese Happiness Inventory, the Brief Fatigue Inventory and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. Statistical analyses include independent-samples ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board (No. 202 202 198B0). The study findings will be disseminated through international conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07196488 (First Submitted 2025-09-06).

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsResilience, PsychologicalSpousesAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesTaiwanCancer SurvivorsFamilyNursing CareProstatic NeoplasmsPsychosocial InterventionUrological tumours

Identifiers

PMID42366001
PMCPMC13311589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.