ReviewClinical & experimental ophthalmology
Biopsy of Iris and Anterior Chamber Tumours: Fine Needle, Minimally Invasive and Excision Techniques - Review.
Review in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several benign, inflammatory and malignant lesions can present as iris or anterior chamber masses, including iris naevi, cysts, adenomas, leiomyomas, nodules, vascular tumours, melanomas, metastases, as well as iris and pigment epithelium adenocarcinomas. Fortunately, benign iris lesions are much more common than malignant tumours and many can be diagnosed by clinical and contemporary non-invasive analyses. However, differentiating between enlarging benign and malignant melanocytic lesions remains problematic. Anterior chamber and iris biopsy may include anterior chamber paracentesis and cytology, fine needle aspiration biopsy, vitreous aspiration cutter biopsy, micro-forceps and punch techniques, minimally invasive excision with an anterior chamber device and conventional iridectomy or excision biopsy. However, there may be reluctance from both patient and physician to progress to iris biopsy or excision biopsy as part of a definitive, or staged, management approach for fear of damage to delicate anterior chamber structures, or inadvertent spread of a malignant tumour. This review provides a practical guide to available techniques, highlighting indications, complications and outcomes. Notably, the yield for cytological, histological and cytogenetic results is typically high, significant complications are uncommon, and no cases of external tumour spread have been reported with clear corneal biopsy techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.