ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Refusal of Hospital-Based Oral Cancer Treatment Driven by Health Beliefs in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHospital-based treatment refusal among oral cancer (OC) patients remains poorly understood. No qualitative studies have examined this phenomenon specifically in OC. This study aimed to explore the beliefs and attitudes underlying treatment refusal among OC patients in Pakistan.
methodsWe conducted a theory-informed qualitative case study guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM) using purposive criterion sampling. Semistructured interviews were conducted with eight OC patients who refused hospital-based treatment, eight family members involved in decision-making, and three oral surgeons. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Emergent themes were subsequently interpreted in relation to HBM constructs using abductive, theory-informed pattern matching. Methodological rigour was enhanced through data source triangulation and member checking.
resultsFrom the 19 in-depth interviews, we identified seven interconnected themes underlying treatment refusal: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, cues to action, and religious beliefs. Treatment refusal was shaped by fatalistic perceptions of cancer incurability, intense fears of treatment-related harm, and substantial financial, access, and role-related constraints. Strong family influence and trust in traditional and complementary medicine further reinforced these decisions. Religious interpretations functioned bidirectionally, reinforcing acceptance of divine destiny and legitimizing nonbiomedical healing pathways, while in some cases also supporting treatment-seeking through religious doctrine.
conclusionRefusal of hospital-based OC treatment reflects a culturally embedded decision-making process shaped by interacting sociocultural, religious, and structural factors. The findings support the applicability of the HBM in this context and inform the development of culturally responsive, communication-focused interventions in oral oncology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Recognition of belief-driven treatment refusal can help clinicians tailor communication, address fears of treatment harm, and engage family and religious influences to improve acceptance of hospital-based OC care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.