ReviewPaediatric anaesthesia2026
Perspectives in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Part 4-Evolving Solutions in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: From Registries to a Learning Health System Approach.
Review in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPediatric ambulatory anesthesia has rapidly evolved as the predominant model for surgical care in the United States, yet variability in practice standards and outcomes persists. This final installment of a four-part series addresses the gaps that remain between research and real-world practice, highlighting the limitations of traditional research models and existing registries in translating evidence into improved universal care and creation of benchmarks.
methodsThrough a review of selected pediatric databases and registries, this paper examines their contributions, strengths, and challenges in generating actionable knowledge and standardizing care.
resultsThe discussion emphasizes the impact of unwarranted variation, the slow adoption of clinical guidelines, and the need for more robust, inclusive data sources that reflect the realities of community-based practice, where most children receive their care rather than the experience of large, academic centers. DISCUSSION: To address these challenges, we propose the need to create a multicenter, collaborative Learning Health System (LHS) consortium, leveraging real-world electronic medical record data, continuous quality improvement, and implementation science focused on improving quality of care and outcomes in ambulatory Pediatric Anesthesia practice. This model prioritizes adaptive methodologies, inclusive participation across diverse practice settings, and iterative, data-driven improvements. One of the greatest challenges is the ability to capture data from a range of care settings, and not just tertiary and quaternary children's hospitals. We delve into a possible solution to overcome this limitation by extending its reach beyond safety. This proposed LHS consortium offers the possibility of a pragmatic and sustainable pathway to accelerate the development and dissemination of standards and best practices in Pediatric Anesthesia. By fostering collaboration, embracing positive deviance, and bridging the gap between research and practice, this approach ensures that every child benefits from the highest standards of safety, quality, and innovation-regardless of where their care is delivered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.