Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42365388›Full record

SynthesisBMC pharmacology & toxicology2026

Comparative efficacy and safety of oral ivermectin, topical permethrin, and combination in the treatment of patients with classic scabies: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Rowena F Genuino, Ma Christina Filomena R Batac, Clarence Pio Rey C Yacapin, Belen L Dofitas, Kimberly Anne G Ednalino, Ma Isabela P Ong, Ma Bettina Teresa G Pascual, Francis R Capule, Fernando B Garcia, Mary Ann J Ladia and 4 more

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rowena F GenuinoDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines. rfgenuino@post.upm.edu.ph.
Ma Christina Filomena R BatacDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Clarence Pio Rey C YacapinDepartment of Surgery, Asian Hospital and Medical Center, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
Belen L DofitasDepartment of Dermatology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Kimberly Anne G EdnalinoDepartment of Dermatology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Ma Isabela P OngDepartment of Dermatology, Makati Medical Center, Makati, Philippines.
Ma Bettina Teresa G PascualDepartment of Dermatology, Makati Medical Center, Makati, Philippines.
Francis R CapuleDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Fernando B GarciaDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Mary Ann J LadiaInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health-University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Malaya P SantosMapua School of Medicine, Mapua University, Makati, Philippines.
Ailyn M YabesDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Amiel Nazer C BermudezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Maria Stephanie Fay S CagayanDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.

Funding

UPM National Institutes of Health Research Fund 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral ivermectin is commonly used as a second-line treatment for classic scabies, particularly in cases of treatment failure or poor adherence to topical permethrin, the standard of care. However, the comparative efficacy and safety of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, remains unclear. This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of these treatments to guide clinicians and policymakers.

methodsOn April 17, 2022, we conducted a comprehensive search of databases, including MEDLINE and CENTRAL, as well as secondary sources for randomized controlled trials comparing oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with topical permethrin, and topical permethrin, or any of the three with other scabicides or placebo/vehicle/no treatment among patients with classic scabies. The primary outcomes were clinical cure and serious adverse events. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Network meta-analyses were performed using available case analysis and a random-effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses explored the impact of methodologic decisions and known effect modifiers. Effect estimates and certainty of evidence ratings were presented in the Summary of Findings tables.

resultsWe included 38 RCTs (N = 4879), most of which had moderate or high overall risk of bias. Oral ivermectin, given in varying dosing regimens (single dose, two-dose, or flexible dosing) showed little or no difference in clinical cure rates compared to permethrin, which was also administered in different dosing schedules, at one to two weeks post-treatment (network RR 0.95, 95% CI [0.89, 1.02]; 30 RCTs, N = 3469; global inconsistency P = 0.42; low certainty evidence). Serious adverse events were rare (1/3212; 0.03%, 95% CI [0.000079, 0.17]; 29 RCTs; very low certainty evidence). One child who received oral ivermectin was hospitalized for cellulitis but eventually recovered. Limited data (1 RCT; n = 100) suggested that combination oral ivermectin/permethrin may be as effective or more effective than permethrin for clinical cure at one to two weeks (network RR 1.21, 95% CI [0.94, 1.56]; low certainty evidence).

conclusionThere may be little or no difference between oral ivermectin and permethrin in clinical cure. However, combination therapy with oral ivermectin and permethrin may be as good as or better than permethrin alone. The rate of serious adverse events is uncertain. Further well-designed RCTs should be conducted to confirm the findings and inform clinical practice and public health policy on scabies control. STUDY REGISTRATION: UPM RGAO-2021-1058; PHRR230322-005013; PROSPERO CRD42022278007.

Indexed as

Antiparasitic AgentsInsecticidesIvermectinPermethrinScabiesAdministration, OralAdministration, TopicalDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansTreatment OutcomeAntiparasitic AgentsInsecticidesIvermectinPermethrinIvermectinNetwork meta-analysisPermethrinScabiesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42365388
PMCPMC13576335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.