ReviewBiomarker research2026
Biology-aligned cervical cancer screening: target-centric biomarkers and next-generation diagnostic platforms.
Review in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide, with mortality disproportionately concentrated in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), where screening infrastructure is limited. Although persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection drives nearly all cervical cancers through a prolonged preinvasive window, making the disease both preventable and detectable, current screening modalities face biological and operational limitations that constrain their global impact. Cytology-based methods suffer from moderate sensitivity and subjective interpretations. HPV DNA testing is highly sensitive, it lacks specificity for transforming infections and shifts the diagnostic burden toward triage and colposcopy. Meanwhile, visual inspection methods are accessible, they offer limited reproducibility. In this review, we adopt a target-centric diagnostic framework that organizes cervical cancer screening not by detection platform but by the biological class of the marker being interrogated. We first examined the molecular pathogenesis of cervical carcinogenesis, including HPV genotype-specific biology, viral integration dynamics, oncogene-driven transformation, and epigenetic consolidation, to establish the biological rationale for each biomarker category. We then systematically evaluated conventional screening modalities and their limitations before reviewing emerging diagnostic technologies across four target domains: HPV-derived markers (DNA, mRNA, capsid proteins), host cell-cycle regulators (p16
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.