Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2026
Association between red blood cell transfusion volume and infection risk: a dose-response analysis of a nationwide trauma registry.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfection is a major complication after trauma and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Although red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is an essential component of resuscitation in trauma patients, its relationship with infection risk remains controversial. Furthermore, the dose-response relationship has not been fully elucidated.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study using a nationwide trauma registry in Japan. Trauma patients registered between 2019 and 2021 were included. Patients were categorized into four groups according to RBC transfusion volume within the first 24 h after admission: None (0 units), Low (1-4 units), Moderate (5-9 units), and High (≥ 10 units). The primary outcome was in-hospital infection. Multivariable modified Poisson regression analyses were performed to estimate adjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Furthermore, we performed multivariable-adjusted restricted cubic spline analyses with four knots to assess the adjusted dose-response relationship between RBC transfusion volume and the risk of in-hospital infection.
resultsA total of 55,807 patients were analyzed. The incidence of in-hospital infection increased across transfusion categories: 4,399/48,308 (9.1%) in the None group, 618/3,724 (16.6%) in the Low group, 396/1,733 (22.8%) in the Moderate group, and 548/2,042 (26.8%) in the High group. In multivariable analysis, compared with the None group, Low (adjusted RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.62-2.10), Moderate (adjusted RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.69-2.26) and High (adjusted RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.76-2.43) transfusion volumes were associated with significantly increased risks of infection, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analyses showed an increase in infection risk at lower transfusion volumes, followed by a plateau at higher transfusion volumes.
conclusionsRBC transfusion volume within the first 24 h after trauma was associated with in-hospital infection risk. The association was generally linear at lower transfusion volumes, whereas a plateau was observed at higher transfusion volumes. Given the observational nature of this study, these findings should be interpreted cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.