Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42365364›Full record

Trial reportTrials2026

Recruitment strategies for a randomized controlled trial in a rural American Indian community: the Cooking for Health Study.

Sarah A Green, Rae O'Leary, Corrine M Huber, Anne N Thorndike, Lyle G Best, Meagan C Brown, Marcia O'Leary, Jason Umans, Arlette Hager, Rebecca Whitebull and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03699709 (Cooking for Health in a Large American Indian Community in the North-Central United States), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03699709 nacompletednot on this map

Cooking for Health in a Large American Indian Community in the North-Central United States

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2020 to 2023Enrolled176ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsBudgeting, purchasing and cooking educational intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sarah A GreenUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rae O'LearyMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Eagle Butte, SD, USA.
Corrine M HuberMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Eagle Butte, SD, USA.
Anne N ThorndikeMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lyle G BestMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Eagle Butte, SD, USA.
Meagan C BrownKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marcia O'LearyMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Eagle Butte, SD, USA.
Jason UmansMedstar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
Arlette HagerMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Eagle Butte, SD, USA.
Rebecca WhitebullMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Eagle Butte, SD, USA.
Shirley BeresfordUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amanda M FrettsUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. amfretts@uw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConducting diet-focused interventions in rural, American Indian (AI), and/or under-resourced communities is critical to improve health. However, interventions that may work in urban or suburban settings may not work in rural or under-resourced communities due to differences in types of locally available food, food preferences, food insecurity, and/or limited access to grocery stores or supermarkets. This paper describes the acceptability of recruitment strategies used in the Cooking for Health (CFH) study, a culturally targeted healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking skills intervention for AIs with type 2 diabetes who live on or around a large reservation in the North-Central United States.

methodsCFH was a two-armed parallel group randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a 12-month intervention on diet, healthy food self-efficacy, food budgeting and cooking skills, and healthy food purchases. The intervention consisted of monthly lessons and videos related to cooking healthy foods, food budgeting skills, and optimal nutrition for diabetes management. AI men and women 18 + years old with diagnosed type 2 diabetes were eligible to participate. Recruitment strategies included passive, active, and word-of-mouth (refer-a-friend) methodologies. Additionally, research staff worked closely with a community partner, the Tribal Diabetes Program, to facilitate enrollment.

resultsOf the 276 individuals screened for eligibility for the study, 226 individuals were deemed eligible to participate. Of these, 176 enrolled, 25 individuals scheduled a baseline study visit but did not show up, and 25 individuals declined participation. Reasons for declining participation included: no longer interested; too busy/employed full-time; already managing diabetes with own healthcare provider; or moved out of the area.

conclusionsThese results support a multi-strategic recruitment approach of passive, active and word-of-mouth strategies for successful recruitment and enrollment of AIs in diet-focused RCTs. It is likely that the recruitment successes were largely due to community involvement and ownership in the study. The importance of trusting mutually beneficial and shared decision-making is also critical to project success.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT03699709. Registered on 5 October 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03699709 .

Indexed as

CookingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diet, HealthyIndians, North AmericanPatient SelectionAdultAgedFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedRural HealthTime FactorsAmerican IndianBudgetingCookingDiabetes mellitusEducationNorth AmericanNutritionRandomized controlled trialRural population

Identifiers

PMID42365364
PMCPMC13573405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.