ArticleAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2026
Diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid progranulin vs. C-reactive protein in septic arthritis: a comparative biomarker study.
Article in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeptic arthritis (SA) is a rapidly progressive joint disease that can lead to cartilage damage if not treated promptly. A prompt and accurate distinction between SA and inflammatory arthritis (IA) is essential for establishing an optimal treatment plan. Progranulin (PRGN), an anti-inflammatory glycoprotein involved in various autoimmune diseases, has rarely been studied as a diagnostic biomarker for infectious arthritis. However, its precise role in this context remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of synovial fluid PRGN (SF-PRGN) in distinguishing SA from IA and osteoarthritis (OA).
methodsThis single-center, cross-sectional study included 59 patients who underwent synovial fluid aspiration and were categorized into three groups: SA (n = 23), IA (n = 18), and OA (n = 18). SA was diagnosed based on a positive synovial fluid culture or fulfillment of clinical criteria suggestive of infection. SF-PRGN levels were measured using ELISA, and synovial fluid C-reactive protein (SF-CRP) levels were determined using an immunoturbidimetric assay.
resultsMean SF-PRGN levels were higher in the SA (339.77 ± 142.16 ng/mL) and IA (300.52 ± 159.60 ng/mL) groups than in the OA group (133.44 ± 41.77 ng/mL), indicating a statistically significant difference between the inflammatory and non-inflammatory groups (p < 0.05). However, the SF-PRGN did not significantly differentiate between SA and IA (p = 0.803). In contrast, SF-CRP levels were markedly elevated in SA (61.91 ± 46.84 mg/L) and demonstrated strong discriminatory power between SA and IA (p < 0.001; AUC: 0.795, p < 0.0001).
conclusionAlthough SF-PRGN levels are elevated in inflammatory arthritis, they lack specificity for SA. SF-CRP exhibited superior diagnostic accuracy in differentiating SA from IA. These findings underscore the need for further research on reliable biomarkers of SA in larger patient cohorts. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinical trial number not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.