ArticleBMC medical education2026
Application of synthetic patient samples in biochemistry laboratory case-based learning course to improve biosafety.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Case-based learning (CBL) requires students to fully engage in class activities, motivates active thinking, and therefore effectively improves the teaching and learning quality. However, CBL method is not commonly used in laboratory courses in medical schools due to the biosafety and the ethical issues of patient samples. Here, we developed a novel method to prepare synthetic sera and doped urine without the need for a patient donor. These materials are safe for both students and teachers and were used in a 3-week biochemistry laboratory CBL course. Fifty-eight second-year undergraduates from Dalian Medical University (China) received the CBL course, while another 56 students in the control group received traditional teaching. In this mode, each biochemical assay was explained and conducted separately without clinical case scenarios. The learning outcomes were assessed via written examinations for all participants, and questionnaires were additionally distributed to students in the CBL group. The results revealed that the CBL course significantly increased their test scores, improved their learning interest, and fostered their self-learning habits and critical thinking with teamwork. As for different genders, more female students endorsed the benefits of the CBL model for skill development, while more male students gave positive feedback on CBL model in terms of stimulating their motivation to study and stated that they preferred CBL model in the future. Notably, this study adopted a quasi-experimental design with grouping based on intact classes and voluntary student participation, which may lead to self-selection bias when interpreting the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.