ArticleBMC oral health2026
Revealing mandibular asymmetry in orthognathic surgery patients via Bonwill triangle morphology: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Bonwill triangle, defined by the mandibular incisor (MI) point and the center of right (CR) and left (CL) condyles, which provide a crucial reference for determining craniofacial symmetry and occlusion. Although three-dimensional imaging has enhanced the precision of triangle measurement, few studies have evaluated Bonwill triangle geometry in patients who have undergone orthognathic surgery (OGS). The present study assessed Bonwill triangle geometry in a Taiwanese population by comparing individuals who underwent OGS and those who did not and by analyzing the effects of sex and age on mandibular asymmetry.
methodsCone-beam computed tomography images from 109 adults (54 in the OGS group and 55 in the non-OGS group) were retrospectively analyzed. Three side lengths of the Bonwill triangle (mandibular incisor point to left condyle (MI-CL), mandibular incisor point to right condyle (MI-CR), and right condyle to left condyle (CR-CL)) were measured using Mimics software. Group comparisons and subgroup analyses by sex and age were conducted using independent and paired t tests and Pearson correlation analysis.
resultsThe OGS group exhibited greater asymmetry in the bilateral side lengths than the non-OGS group did (3.41 ± 2.35 mm vs. 1.69 ± 1.02 mm, p < 0.001), particularly the men in the group (p < 0.001). Additionally, only the men in the OGS group exhibited a negative correlation between age and bilateral side length (r = - 0.480, p = 0.034). CR-CL length did not differ significantly between the OGS and non-OGS groups.
conclusionsThe Bonwill triangle can support preoperative mandibular asymmetryassessments. Candidates for OGS, especially men, exhibit greater skeletal asymmetry than non-OGS candidates do, underscoring a need for individualized planning. Future studies evaluating surgical type and long-term outcomes can enhance the clinical applications of the Bonwill triangle in pre-OGS assessments.
trial registrationThis retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan (CMUH 114REC2019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.