ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Clinical effects of surgical delay in older patients with intertrochanteric fractures: analysis from the National Inpatient Sample Database.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe clinical effect of surgical timing in older patients with intertrochanteric fractures is controversial. Our objective was to assess the association between surgical timing and in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in these patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsIFs patients accepted internal fixation surgery were obtained from the 2002 to 2014 Nationwide inpatient sample database. They were categorized into 3 subgroups according to the time of admission to surgery: early (within 24 h), shorter delays (1 to 2 days), and longer delays (3 to 7 days). The chi-squared test and Kruskal-Wallis test were performed to measure differences among these 3 subgroups. Survey-weighted methods accounted for the complex sampling design. Multiple logistic regression and mixed-effects models were utilized to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
resultsA total of 228,725 patients were obtained from the NIS database. The prevalence of internal fixation surgery in IF patients significantly increased over time. Delayed surgery was associated with longer length of stay, higher hospital charges, and higher risk of postoperative complications. Rates of in-hospital death were 2.110% and 4.214%, respectively in two delay groups. After adjustment, shorter delays were not associated with in-hospital death (OR: 1.007; 95% CI: 0.937-1.082; P = 0.859), whereas longer delays were obviously associated with a higher risk of death during hospitalization (OR: 1.348; 95% CI: 1.218-1.492; P < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses using alternative definitions of time-to-surgery yielded consistent results.
conclusionsIn this study, prolonged waiting time for surgery was significantly associated with a higher risk of adverse in-hospital events. Reasonable preoperative optimization and strive for early surgery may be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.