ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Dysregulated connectivity configuration of functional network model in first-episode, treatment-naive adolescents with major depressive disorder.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric condition that frequently emerges during adolescence, a critical developmental stage characterized by heightened vulnerability to emotional dysregulation. Despite increasing evidence of large-scale brain network dysfunction in adult MDD, the static and dynamic connectivity alterations underlying adolescent MDD remain poorly understood.
methodsWe recruited 29 first-episode, treatment-naïve adolescents with MDD and 29 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data were analyzed using group independent component analysis (ICA) combined with sliding-window clustering to evaluate both static functional network connectivity (sFNC) and dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) across the default mode network (DMN), salience network (SN), central executive network (CEN), and dorsal attention network (DAN). Correlation analyses were performed between connectivity metrics and clinical severity assessed by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17).
resultsCompared with HCs, adolescents with MDD exhibited significantly reduced intra- and inter-network connectivity within the DMN, SN, and CEN, alongside a trend toward increased DAN-SN connectivity. Dynamic analyses revealed reduced state transition frequency, shorter dwell time in low-connectivity states (e.g., DMN-CEN-SN interactions), and longer dwell time in high-connectivity states (e.g., DAN-SN coupling). Clinical analyses demonstrated that weaker intra-DMN and intra-DAN connectivity, as well as reduced DMN-CEN and DMN-SN connectivity, were negatively correlated with HAMD-17 scores. Conversely, prolonged dwell time in hyperconnected states positively correlated with greater symptom severity.
conclusionOur findings highlight distinct static and dynamic network abnormalities in adolescent MDD, including disrupted DMN-CEN competitive balance and maladaptive DAN-SN hyperconnectivity. These alterations may hint at developmental-stage-specific neuropathological mechanisms that could differ from adult depression, although direct comparison with adult cohorts is lacking. Integrating static and dynamic FNC analyses may provide preliminary insights into candidate neuroimaging markers for early detection and intervention strategies in adolescent MDD, though these findings require validation in independent, larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.