Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42365241›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

Peer perceptions of orofacial appearance among older adults - a qualitative study.

Sara Henricsson, Viveca Wallin Bengtsson, Nina Lundegren, Pia Andersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara HenricssonFaculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, SE-291 88, Sweden. sara.henricsson@hkr.se.ORCID 0000-0003-3151-105X
Viveca Wallin BengtssonFaculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, SE-291 88, Sweden.
Nina LundegrenDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, 214 21, Sweden.
Pia AnderssonFaculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, SE-291 88, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrofacial appearance remains socially meaningful throughout later life, as facial and dental features may shape first impressions and social judgments. Yet little is known about how older adults perceive the orofacial appearance of their peers. Against this background, this study explored how adults aged 65 years and older perceive their peers' orofacial appearance (OA).

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants (aged 68-76), strategically recruited from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care-Blekinge (SNAC-B) in Karlskrona. To identify patterns in the data, a thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews.

resultsThe older adults' perceptions of other people's OA were represented in three themes: (i) charisma and personality overshadow orofacial appearance; (ii) it is easy to attribute characteristics as a result of the appearance; (iii) adherence to established norms is expected.

conclusionThis study highlights how older adults' perceptions of peers' OA are shaped by interpersonal impressions and social norms. Charisma, warmth, and facial expression could reduce the importance of specific orofacial features, whereas missing teeth, visible poor oral health, or appearance changes perceived as outside age-appropriate norms could trigger assumptions about lifestyle, vulnerability, or self-care.

Indexed as

AgingFaceOral HealthPeer GroupQualitative ResearchSocial PerceptionAgedFemaleHumansMaleSwedenAgingOlder adultsOral healthOrofacial appearancePeer assessments

Identifiers

PMID42365241
PMCPMC13312759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.