ReviewBMC infectious diseases2026
Lessons in the Wake of a Lassa fever case in the Midwest U.S: epidemiology, management and preparedness gaps.
Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLassa fever (LF) is a zoonotic viral hemorrhagic disease endemic to West Africa that remains persistently neglected despite substantial morbidity, mortality, and outbreak potential. A fixed burden estimate is not available due to the absence of systematic surveillance across endemic regions; passive case detection, limited laboratory capacity, and significant underreporting make precise quantification impossible. Contemporary modeling now projects approximately 2.7 million Lassa virus infections each year across West Africa, with an estimated 3,900 deaths and 2.0 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over a decade - figures that likely still underestimate the true burden (6,86). While most infections are mild or asymptomatic, severe disease is associated with high case-fatality rates, nosocomial transmission, and long-term sequelae. The most recent travel-associated case in the Midwest U.S highlights the ongoing risk of international spread and exposes critical gaps in recognizing and responding to rare but high-consequence pathogens, even in high-resource settings.
methodsThis narrative review synthesizes epidemiologic data, clinical studies, surveillance reports, and outbreak investigations to examine Lassa fever through the lens of outbreak detection, response, and preparedness.
resultsEarly clinical recognition remains difficult due to non-specific presentations and, in non-endemic countries, ignoring travel and exposure history. Non-specific presentation and limited diagnostic tools access contributes to delayed diagnosis and extensive contact investigations. Molecular diagnostics, particularly RT-PCR, remain central to early diagnosis but are influenced by viral genetic diversity and sampling timing. Ribavirin continues to be widely used for treatment and post-exposure prophylaxis despite limited and heterogeneous evidence. Emerging antivirals, monoclonal antibodies, and vaccine candidates show promise but are not yet available for routine use. Outbreak control is further complicated by the complex ecology of Lassa virus, including rodent reservoirs, environmental drivers, and potential involvement of additional host species.
conclusionsLassa fever remains a high-threat pathogen at the intersection of endemic disease and global outbreak preparedness. Travel-associated cases, like the most recent one in Iowa, consistently reveal gaps in infection prevention and control, exposure-risk assessment, and post-exposure management. Early suspicion, followed by immediate isolation, rapid engagement of public health authorities, and timely initiation of infection control and clinical measures is central to limiting downstream consequences. Addressing these gaps will require strengthened laboratory capacity, harmonized surveillance and response frameworks, accelerated development of medical countermeasures, and sustained investment in preparedness strategies applicable to both endemic and non-endemic settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.