ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Machine learning classification and regional differentiation of neuropathologically-confirmed Alzheimer's disease and comorbid Lewy body disease.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) co-occur frequently, and growing evidence, including neuropathology, supports synergistic interplay between the diseases. We tested whether a single T1-weighted MRI scan may differentiate neuropathologically confirmed comorbid AD/DLB and AD controls using heterogeneously acquired neuroimaging.
methodsWe obtained structural neuroimaging, on two groups, AD with and without DLB pathology. Convolutional neural networks are trained across dimensions. We introduce a triple-ensemble strategy consisting of majority voting schemes within a variety of plane permutations. In addition, we conduct voxel-wise statistical analyses.
resultsHere we show convolutional neural networks record a classification accuracy of 0.820 and an f1 score of 0.79 in identifying comorbid DLB/AD from AD patients. Prediction accuracy is higher proximal to date of death, while the trained model largely outperforms clinical baseline diagnosis. The slice-level performance varies depending on the sampled brain location, with sensitivity highest in the temporal lobe and specificity highest in the occipital lobe. In DLB/AD, gray matter is relatively preserved though atrophy is observed in the occipital lobe, suggesting that the comorbidity differentially affects brain loss and may accelerate it in the occipital lobe.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates how machine learning approaches can address diverse neuroimaging data from clinical sources to differentiate neurodegenerative diseases using a true gold standard of neuropathological confirmation. The frameworks utilized here can be extended to other diseases that are frequently co-occurring and feasibly extend to single scan diagnostic clinical utility of scans already being acquired.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.