Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42365178›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Neurodevelopmental care across pediatric critical care settings: toward brain-focused critical care.

Sharon Morag, Tamar Bernstein, Melissa B Jones, Gil Wernovsky, Uri Pollak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sharon Morag *Department of Neonatology, Dana Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tamar Bernstein *The Center for the Study of Child Development, The School of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Melissa B JonesDivision of Cardiac Critical Care, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Gil WernovskyPediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Critical Care, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Uri PollakSection of Pediatric Critical Care, Hadassah University Medical Center, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel. uripol@hadassah.org.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4575-3888

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in neonatal and pediatric critical care have expanded the focus from short‑term survival to include greater attention to long‑term neurodevelopmental health and family well‑being. This narrative review synthesizes the evolution of neurodevelopmental and neuroprotective care across neonatal (NICU), pediatric (PICU), and cardiovascular (CVICU/PCICU) intensive care settings. Developmental care emerged in the NICU through individualized, cue‑based approaches such as the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP), emphasizing stress reduction, protection of sleep, optimized sensory environments, and parent-infant coregulation. As survivorship after critical illness improved, parallel concerns about post‑intensive care morbidities, including cognitive, behavioral, and functional impairments, catalyzed adoption of family‑centered and brain‑focused practices in the PICU, supported by contemporary guidelines integrating pain and sedation optimization, delirium prevention, environmental stewardship, and early mobility. More recently, dedicated cardiac neurodevelopmental programs have adapted NICU principles to the high‑acuity CVICU/PCICU population, pairing hemodynamic vigilance with developmental goals through structured interdisciplinary models (e.g., developmental rounds, holding protocols, early therapy, feeding support, and caregiver mental health resources). Across settings, common implementation domains include family partnership, cue‑based care, protected sleep and circadian support, sensory modulation, humane pain and sedation strategies, early rehabilitation, and coordinated follow‑up after discharge.

conclusionWhile the strength of evidence varies by unit type and outcome, available data support feasibility and potential benefits for delirium reduction, functional recovery, feeding, parent experience, and early developmental trajectories. Continued multicenter research and implementation science are needed to define optimal bundles, equity‑informed delivery, and durable long‑term outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Neurodevelopmental care is well established in NICUs, emphasizing cue-based care, pain reduction, environmental protection, and family partnership. • Survivors of pediatric and cardiac critical illness remain at risk for cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and functional impairments. WHAT IS NEW: • This review extends neurodevelopmental care beyond the NICU to PICU and CVICU settings. • It proposes a unified multidisciplinary framework for brain-focused critical care across pediatric ICU environments.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care Units, PediatricNeurodevelopmental DisordersChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalNeurodevelopmentNeurodevelopmental careNICUPICU

Identifiers

PMID42365178
PMCPMC13310202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.