ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting migratory survival in a songbird hybrid zone using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extrinsic postzygotic isolation-selection against hybrids between populations that have undergone divergent ecological adaptation-is hypothesized to play a central role in speciation but is notoriously difficult to demonstrate, as it requires evidence that ecologically relevant traits influence hybrid fitness. We addressed this challenge using individual radio tracking and machine learning in a hybrid zone between two songbirds where differences in seasonal migration are thought to serve as extrinsic isolating barriers. Using detection rates as a proxy for survival, we built a random forest classification model to predict survival from a set of genetic, morphological, and behavioural traits. The model achieved moderate overall accuracy (62%), with class-specific performance metrics that exceeded null expectations for birds that survived migration. Although no traits had consistent univariate effects on model prediction, the traits that contributed most to classification were migration year, sex, wing shape, and fall migratory orientation. When considering pairwise combinations of traits, the strongest effects were driven by interactions with migration year, suggesting that temporal variation strongly modulates the predictive contribution of all other variables. These results underscore the challenges of predicting complex and inherently stochastic ecological outcomes such as survival. Nonetheless, the traits most consistently associated with survival provide promising targets for future investigation, and our approach offers a roadmap for similar efforts to link phenotypic variation with fitness in natural populations.
Identifiers
42365089What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.