ArticleScientific reports2026
The impact of ethnicity on longitudinal humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ethnic differences in SARS-CoV‑2 vaccine immunogenicity have been reported after primary vaccination, but it remains unclear whether these disparities persist following booster doses or whether patterns of immune boosting and waning differ across ethnic groups. In this longitudinal study of healthcare workers enrolled in the BE‑DIRECT cohort, we evaluated humoral and cellular immune responses before booster vaccination, 3-4 weeks afterwards, and at approximately six months. Anti‑spike and neutralising antibodies, as well as T‑cell ELISpot responses to spike peptides, were quantified, and changes across boosting and waning phases were examined using multivariable regression adjusting for demographic factors, vaccine regimen, prior infection and baseline immune measures. South Asian participants demonstrated substantially higher post‑booster anti‑spike titres than White participants, although titres converged by six months. After adjustment, South Asian individuals exhibited greater increases in total anti-spike and neutralising antibody titres, while decline in antibody titres between post-booster and six-month post-booster sampling points were similar across ethnic groups. T‑cell responses during the boosting phase did not differ, but decline of S2‑specific and overall spike‑specific T‑cell responses between post-booster and six-month post-booster sampling points occurred more slowly in South Asians. These findings indicate that South Asian healthcare workers mount stronger early booster‑induced antibody responses and exhibit more sustained T‑cell immunity, highlighting the need to understand underlying mechanisms and implications for vaccine effectiveness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.