ArticleNature communications2026
Intranasal boosting induces variant-specific responses in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-imprinted mice.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The continued evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants that evade immunity highlights a need to develop vaccines that elicit variant-specific antibodies and neutralize emerging strains. However, immune imprinting from antecedent SARS-CoV-2 exposure can limit the generation of such antibodies. Here, we evaluate strategies to enhance variant-specific antibody responses in female mice primed with Wuhan-1 spike-based mRNA or chimpanzee adenoviral-vectored (ChAd) vaccines and boosted with Omicron variant-matched vaccines. Altering the intramuscular injection site did not substantially affect variant-specific serum antibody responses. However, increasing booster antigen doses, performing repeated boosters, and administering booster vaccines intranasally enhanced variant-specific responses against the vaccine-matched Omicron strain. Boosting intranasally with a ChAd vaccine encoding the spike protein of Omicron XBB.1.5 elicited stronger XBB.1.5-specific responses in serum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and draining lymph nodes than intramuscular boosting with the same vaccine. Regardless of booster regimen, neutralizing activity against XBB.1.5 was predominantly mediated by antibodies that were non-reactive to Wuhan-1 spike. These findings establish that in mice, intranasal or repeated variant-matched boosting can overcome the effects of imprinting and enhance immunity against SARS-CoV-2 strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.