ArticleThe Eurasian journal of medicine2026
Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Patients Subjected to Physical Restraint in a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsychiatric intensive care units have significant implications for patient safety and clinical outcomes. Understanding the demographic and clinical characteristics of restrained patients is essential for developing evidence-based protocols and reducing unnecessary restraint use. The aim of this retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study was to determine the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients subjected to physical restraint in a psychiatric intensive care unit.
methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study analyzed 138 patients subjected to physical restraint in a psychiatric intensive care unit between January 2023 and December 2023. Data were collected through systematic chart review using a standardized physical restraint monitoring form from the Hospital Quality and Standards System, designed specifically for type 2 (behavioral safety) restraint documentation. Variables included demographic characteristics, primary diagnoses, restraint indications, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 28.0. The study followed STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics.
resultsOut of 138 patients, 95 (68.8%) were male with a mean age of 51.48 Å} 15.02 years. Primary restraint indications included noncompliance with medical treatment (39 patients, 28.3%), severe agitation (37 patients, 26.8%), orientation disturbances (32 patients, 23.2%), and self-harm behaviors (30 patients, 21.7%). The most common primary diagnoses were nonorganic psychosis (55 patients, 39.9%), bipolar disorder (30 patients, 21.7%), and delirium tremens (20 patients, 14.5%). Mean intensive care unit length of stay was 11.87 Å} 14.04 days.
conclusionThis study provides essential baseline data on physical restraint use in psychiatric intensive care, demonstrating male predominance and identifying key clinical indicators. These findings support the development of targeted interventions and evidence-based restraint protocols to optimize patient care while minimizing restrictive practices. Cite this article as: Cengisiz C, Nehir S. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients subjected to physical restraint in a psychiatric intensive care unit: A retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study. Eurasian J Med. 2026, 58(3), 0961, doi: 10.5152/ eurasianjmed.2026.25961.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.