ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2026
O-arm navigation vs. freehand screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comparative analysis of screw size and reoperation rates.
Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePedicle screw fixation is the gold standard for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Prior to the adoption of intraoperative O-arm navigation, surgeons relied on freehand pedicle screw insertion. While freehand insertion demonstrates acceptable safety, comparative data on screw size selection between techniques remain limited. Screw size selection, screw size variability, and complication rates between O-arm navigation and freehand pedicle screw techniques in AIS surgery were compared.
methodsThis was a retrospective comparative cohort study of AIS patients treated with either freehand or navigated pedicle screw insertion by a single senior surgeon. Two cohorts of consecutive AIS patients were analyzed: freehand (n=137; February 2014-November 2018) and navigated (n=137; September 2018-August 2024). Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained surgical registry. Measured outcomes included: (1) screw diameter distribution per vertebral level; (2) pedicles deemed too small to cannulate; (3) intra- and intervertebral screw size variability; (4) intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rates; and (5) reoperation for symptomatic screws. Screw diameter distributions were analyzed by region and vertebral level. Variability in screw size was evaluated within vertebrae and between adjacent vertebrae. Rates of non-cannulatable pedicles, CSF leaks, and symptomatic screw reoperations were compared using chi-square and t-tests.
resultsOperative time was longer in the navigated cohort (312 ± 54 minutes) compared to the freehand cohort (279 ± 48 minutes, P < .001). Navigation resulted in a broader range of screw diameters. Screws sized 4.0-4.5 mm were used in 49.6% of navigated cases vs. 0.4% of freehand cases (P < .0001), while screws ≥7.0 mm were used in 1.5% vs. 0%, respectively (P = .003). Use of 5.0 mm screws was similar (18.0% vs. 13.7%, P=.16), while screws sized 5.5-6.5mm were more common in freehand cases (85.9% vs. 30.8%, P < .0001). Intravertebral screw size differences ≥1.5 mm were seen in 3.6% of navigated vertebrae vs. 0.2% in freehand (P < .0001), and intervertebral (adjacentlevel) differences occurred in 6.9% vs. 0% (P < .0001). Pedicles too small to cannulate were identified in 5.0% of navigated cases vs. 1.9% freehand (P < .0001), with greater right-sided prevalence in both cohorts. Intraoperative CSF leaks occurred in 2.7% of navigated cases vs. 0.7% freehand (P=.397). Symptomatic screw-related reoperations were infrequent in both cohorts (1.5% navigation vs. 3.6% freehand, P=.44).
conclusionNavigation was associated with broader screw size utilization, greater intra- and intervertebral screw diameter variability, and improved identification of pedicles too small to safely instrument. Although complication and reoperation rates were low in both groups, there was a non-significant trend toward fewer symptomatic screw-related reoperations in the navigated cohort. These findings suggest that navigation enhances intraoperative matching of screw size to pedicle anatomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study. Cite this article as: Ramanathan R, Luck C, Dede O, Ward T. O-arm navigation vs. freehand screw.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.