Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42364126›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2026

The exposure of adolescent girls with/without disabilities to discrimination: cross-sectional analyses of nationally representative surveys undertaken in 37 countries.

Eric Emerson, Katrina Scior, Gwynnyth Llewellyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric EmersonFaculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1776-6032
Katrina SciorDepartment of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-0090
Gwynnyth LlewellynSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2014-4330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the prevalence of exposure to discrimination among adolescent girls with/without disability, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsSecondary analysis of nationally representative data collected on self-reported discrimination from 30 705 adolescent girls in 37 low- and middle-income countries in Round 6 (2017-2023) of UNICEF's Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS).

resultsOur results indicated that: (i) adolescent girls with disability were 1.66 times more likely to be exposed to discrimination than adolescent girls without disability; (ii) adolescent girls with disability were at higher risk of exposure to all forms of discrimination measured; (iii) they were also significantly more likely to be exposed to discrimination if they lived in poorer households and had mothers with lower than secondary level education; (iv) there was no association between country level of human development and the magnitude of the risk of adolescent girls with disability being exposed to discrimination.

conclusionsAdolescent girls with disability are at significantly increased risk of exposure to discrimination based on disability and other characteristics (e.g. age, gender). Monitoring risk of discrimination among people with disability needs to move beyond a narrow focus on disability-related discrimination.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesDisability DiscriminationFemaleHumansSurveys and Questionnairesdisabilitiessocial determinantsyoung people

Identifiers

PMID42364126
PMCPMC13531698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.