ArticleJournal of medical entomology2026
Haemosporidian parasites in Kansas birds: molecular and histological evidence implicating Culicoides haematopotus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in transmission.
Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Haemosporidian parasites of birds are maintained through complex interactions among vertebrate hosts, arthropod vectors, and the parasites themselves, yet their vector-parasite relationships remain poorly resolved under natural conditions in North America. Haemoproteus species are among the most prevalent avian blood parasites and have been implicated in reduced host fitness and malaria-like disease. Here, we combined molecular and histological approaches to investigate Haemoproteus prevalence in wild birds and to identify potential Culicoides biting midge vectors in Kansas. Blood meals from field-collected Culicoides and hunter-collected turkey blood samples were screened using nested PCR targeting the Haemoproteus cytochrome b gene, followed by Sanger sequencing. We additionally dissected and microscopically examined salivary glands as well as turkey blood smears. Nearly all turkey blood samples (95.7%) were positive for Haemoproteus, revealing 2 distinct parasite clades and frequent coinfections. In contrast, Culicoides-based surveillance may have underestimated parasite prevalence in turkeys. Only Culicoides haematopotus consistently tested positive by PCR, and this species was the only one in which Haemoproteus sporozoites were detected in salivary glands. Sequencing of PCR amplicons from unfed C. haematopotus revealed amplification of a Culicoides-specific noncoding genomic region, highlighting limitations of molecular detection alone for vector incrimination. Together, these findings provide field-based evidence that C. haematopotus may serve as a vector of Haemoproteus in wild turkeys in Kansas, emphasizing the importance of integrating molecular and histological data when evaluating vector competence and potential population-level effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.