ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Orchestrator multi-agent clinical decision support system for secondary headache diagnosis in primary care.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSecondary headaches require urgent recognition due to potentially devastating consequences if untreated. Despite established clinical "red flag" criteria, identifying patients needing immediate evaluation remains challenging in primary care. This study developed and evaluated a large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent clinical decision support system for interpretable secondary headache diagnosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe first established 7 clinically relevant secondary headache red flag domains through manual review and synthesis of clinical guidelines. Based on these domains, we designed an LLM-based system using an orchestrator-specialist multi-agent architecture that decomposes diagnostic reasoning into 7 guideline-aligned agents corresponding to key red flag features. Each agent generates structured, evidence-grounded reasoning, coordinated by a central orchestrator. The system was evaluated on 90 expert-validated secondary headache cases and compared with a single-LLM baseline under 2 prompting strategies: question-based prompting (QPrompt) and guideline-based prompting (GPrompt). Five open-source LLMs (Qwen-8b, Qwen-14b, Qwen-30b, GPT-OSS-20b, and Llama-3.1-8b) were tested.
resultsThe orchestrated multi-agent system with GPrompt achieved the highest red flag classification performance across models, measured by F1 score. Performance gains were consistent and more pronounced in smaller LLMs, suggesting that structured reasoning improves efficiency and accuracy beyond prompt engineering alone. The framework also produced transparent and guideline-aligned intermediate reasoning. DISCUSSION: Decomposing clinical reasoning into specialized agents enhances interpretability and diagnostic reliability compared with monolithic LLM approaches. Multi-agent orchestration provides a clinically aligned framework for explainable decision support.
conclusionAn orchestrator-specialist multi-agent LLM framework improves secondary headache diagnosis accuracy and transparency, supporting the development of explainable AI systems for time-constrained clinical decision-making in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.