ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
HDAC3 in Alzheimer's Disease: established evidence, unresolved questions, and translational priorities.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) is increasingly implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet its precise pathogenic role and therapeutic value remain unresolved. This mini-review critically examines the current evidence for HDAC3 in AD, with a focus on what is established, what remains uncertain, and what is needed for translation. We review the data linking HDAC3 to amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation, Tau pathology, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction, while highlighting key limitations in the field, including weak causal evidence, inconsistent cell type-specific findings, insufficient human brain validation, and the lack of proof that HDAC3 serves as a central mechanistic node across AD-related pathways. We also discuss major translational challenges, including poor inhibitor selectivity, uncertain brain penetrance, potential safety concerns, and the absence of standardized preclinical benchmarks. We propose that future progress will require human evidence, cell type-specific causal studies, integrated mechanistic models, and more rigorous pharmacological validation. Together, these considerations define a clearer roadmap for evaluating HDAC3 as a biologically credible and clinically actionable target in AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42363974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.